Talk:SL95

SL95 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 20, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that due to technical malfunctions, it took nine years from the date SL95 trams of Oslo, Norway, were ordered until all units were in service?

Trains: Streetcars Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 49, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SL95/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ---Dough 48 72 01:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments:

The sentence "They can be found on lines 13, 17, 18 and sometimes 19." sounds awkward.
"1995-order" should not be hyphenated.
In the sentence "It has 100% low-floor, is 2.65 metres (8 ft 8 in) wide and also had outward-opening doors.", the tense needs to agree.
"one trams was delivered that would satisfy all the criteria." sounds awkward.
The sentence "1 November 2002 was the last day with SM91 in service. By then, 27 of the SL95-trams had been delivered, and Oslo Sporveier was able to operate its entire network with only articulated trams" should not begin with a numeral.
The sentence "These upgrades were planned completed by 2009." sounds awkward.
The sentences "There are 88 seats, of which 64 are on the high-floor section. Total capacity is 212 riders." should be combined.

I am placing the article on hold. ---Dough 48 72 01:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the view. Arsenikk ^(talk) 09:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. ---Dough 48 72 16:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum radius

500 m as the minimum radius sounds like a typo (and the associated 1600 feet figure seems like a direct conversion of that typo). That figure is a factor ten higher than any other streetcar; most mainline locomotives can run on curve radii down to 150 m. The curves on the pictures look tighter than that, too. I'd guess the real figure is 50 m, which would be at the high end for streetcars (which fits the surrounding text) but not yet completely out of it. However, I have no sources that confirm or deny this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.200.249 (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sl18

There is a link in this article to tram series sl18. It is a redirect to CAS Urbos. But that article has no mention of Oslo at all. Either article would have to be amended? 193.90.160.128 (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]