Talk:SIX Financial Information

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Promotional content

This page uses too many value statements:

"the company is now part of a financial powerhouse"
"With offices in 23 countries, SIX Telekurs combines the advantages of global presence and local know-how."

Advertisement on Wikipedia is expressly forbidden. --Acolombi (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed these. Thanks -- Rgnewbury (talk) 10:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vendor-oriented

The article is visibly vendor-oriented. It lacks a paragraph History (the renaming from Telekurs to SIX Telekurs is not even explained), another on actual product offerings, a third on Main competitors...Bmathis (talk) 08:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "vendor oriented". It is an article about SIX Telekurs and will naturallly be oriented towards the business fo the division therefore. Please be more specific if you think I have missed something. (please also compare to reuters and Thomson_Reuters. More generic information on data vending can be found at financial data vendors

I added a section on competitors and separated out the hisotry part (which was already there, but not completely clear.)

I have not added anything about services provided. In fact the company sells data, not services and in any case, advertising is not allowed - and this is not the point of the article anyway. Thanks for the comments. Rgnewbury (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. However could you enrich the article by answering questions such as :

Why did not Telekurs attempt to diversify into electronic trading or risk-management software like Reuters or Bloomberg did?
Why did not Telekurs take over Infotec and emerge as the sole Swiss data vendor? Does not Telekurs suffer from its size compared to that of its few, but much bigger, competitors?
How dependent is Telekurs from the Swiss giants UBS and Credit Suisse for its turnover?
Why the renaming, and why SIX? What is the underlying message towards the market?

Note an article has existed in French on Fininfo but it had been suppressed because it could be perceived as an advertisement. However, such an article is missing. If you know the subject could you contribute to it either by a dedicated article or by inserting a chapter in the SIX Telekurs article? (on the other hand, you could remove the list of their locations)

Regards. Bmathis (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruno,

I'm not sure how useful it is to discuss why the company did NOT do something. Comments on the company's size and turnover dependencies are not encyclopaedic. Much of this information can be found in annual reports on the SIX Group website (http://www.six-group.com) The renaming to SIX is explained in the table. What might be needed is a page on SIX Group which would cover the meaning of the name etc. On the other hand, the list of countries is useful as it shows the global nature of the division. Hope that helps. -- Rgnewbury (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Six tes logo rgb s.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Six tes logo rgb s.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Six tes logo rgb s.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]