User talk:Rgnewbury

March 2009

Actually, Xasax is a Vendor of Record and sources data from the exchanges directly, and distributing it to other vendors, too. The website (www.xasax.com) clearly states Vendor of Record. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.105.222.202 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Telekurs has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alansohn! Thanks for your welcome. The page Telekurs I edited was actually one I began working on and set-up in error. The page actually needs to be deleted, but I can't find out how to request that. The full information was actually started on the correctly named page SIX Telekurs Thanks User:Rgnewbury

May 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Homophobia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you have concerns about the neutrality of this article, please bring them to the article's talk page. Making point-of-view edits will not help your case and may result in your editor priviledges being suspended.

Way to go on the threats... I have concerns about the offence that that banner causes and the fact that there is no analysis around it. Regardless of my personal point of view, it is offensive and merits commentary rather than just being posted as an almost an advert. Please sign your posts on talk pages. Rgnewbury (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Not exactly civil

WP:CIVIL violations are serious accusations and not be taken lightly if this is real I advise you take it up with the appropriate noticeboard. I am sorry you were offended but edit summaries are just that summaries, straight to point, but do not misinterpret the lack of flowery language as a personal attack.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL says exactly that you should be careful with summaries. We all give our time in good faith and one or two "flowery" (or civil) words can help to reward. Thanks for your response. Rgnewbury (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rgnewbury. You have new messages at Talk:World War Z.
Message added 00:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- saberwyn 00:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Rgnewbury. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added 10:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dismas|^(talk) 10:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Rgnewbury, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plusnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeview. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rgnewbury. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rgnewbury. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]