Talk:Ruamrudee International School
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by Chris troutman (talk · contribs) on 22 November 2017 with the comment: Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The sources I could find did not seem to be both independent and reliable, or pass the bar of WP:SIGCOV. It was contested by Paul 012 (talk · contribs) on 12:38, 22 November 2017 with the comment: PROD contested. Among the top five international schools in the country. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Information on this page has been copied off this page [1]. This article should be considered for revision. Amanbis 14:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's the other way round. The about.com article you mention has copied the article from Wikipedia. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 16:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Ris logo.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Ris logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
POV
[edit]I've added the POV tag since currently the entire article reads like a puff piece for the school. Cat-five - talk 09:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
List of admins
[edit]@Do do doggy: Hello. I've removed the list of administrators, because that is not typically included in a quality Wikipedia article for a school. Perhaps the very headmost admins can be mentioned, but only with reliable sources. Notable alumni must also be supported by reliable sources. "Notable" implies that they are notable enough for an article of their own, so sources should be substantial and independent of the person/school. See WP:NBIO if this is unclear. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 04:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- roger, Thanks for the info, and make it better. (Do do doggy 04:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ruamrudee International School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203001521/http://www.rism.ac.th/ris/inner210.php?p=210 to http://www.rism.ac.th/ris/inner210.php?p=210
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010303132730/http://www.moe.go.th/English/sch1-10.htm to http://www.moe.go.th/English/sch1-10.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
remove bad information
[edit]On Feb 20 2018, Saw some Wrongfull information which I had removed it out. Seems like there are 3 sockpuppets.
Request semi lock
[edit]![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request for 10 days plus because of many scams— Preceding unsigned comment added by Do do doggy (talk • contribs) 12:27, February 20, 2018 (UTC)
Not done: @Do do doggy:, it is not clear what you mean by "many scams". This is not where page protection is requested, however. The Page Protection Policy is at this link and the Request for Page Protection noticeboard is at this link. I hope that helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks (Do do doggy 17:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC))
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and New Account with false information. Do do doggy 18:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
- Request semi protection too! (Do do doggy 01:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC))