Talk:Rosedale Railway
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trains Assessment
[edit]I've rated this as Stub class, using criteria from WP:ASSESS
- a particularly useful picture or graphic = no ,pictures should be available to illustrate the article via Geograph (see my page).
- multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic = yes
- a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic = no - there are no subheadings, article could be greatly expanded, someone wrote a book about it after all!
- multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article = no
Comment - This article is not yet Start class in my opinion, despite being rated at Start class by the Yorkshire Wikiproject. More needs to be done to achieve this.Mjroots (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mjroots Better late than never! Still more to come on this, but time is against me. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it's reached Start class now. Mjroots (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rosedale Railway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 01:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 04:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)