Jump to content

Talk:Rosedale Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trains Assessment

[edit]

I've rated this as Stub class, using criteria from WP:ASSESS

  • a particularly useful picture or graphic = no ,pictures should be available to illustrate the article via Geograph (see my page).
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic = yes
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic = no - there are no subheadings, article could be greatly expanded, someone wrote a book about it after all!
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article = no

Comment - This article is not yet Start class in my opinion, despite being rated at Start class by the Yorkshire Wikiproject. More needs to be done to achieve this.Mjroots (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mjroots Better late than never! Still more to come on this, but time is against me. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's reached Start class now. Mjroots (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rosedale Railway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox/line diagram
  2. Requires photographs, if possible
  3. Referencing needs improving to inline citations to indicate pages of book each item is from
Keith D (talk) 12:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:50, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 04:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)