Talk:Rory Flanagan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rory Flanagan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Television: Glee Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Glee task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Sources

Extended content

--Another Believer _(Talk) 16:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Another Believer _(Talk) 15:59, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/tv-glee-gets-all-christmassy/story-fn6bfkm6-1226267058099 - JuneGloom Talk 15:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset: I think you've worked on this article the most. I wonder if you have any recollection or insight as to how close this article may be to meeting Good article criteria? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, I think the article is still C-class, and has quite a ways to go before it could survive a GA review. Indeed, about half of the changes made since I rated the article in 2012 did more harm than good in terms of quality. All of the sections should be expanded—Development in particular needs more meat—and there isn't any mention of "Glee, Actually" (except the allusion to a fourth-season episode in the lede). The Storylines section is completely unsourced, and needs sourcing. Reception doesn't go very far, either. I honestly don't think there will ever be enough information available to get this article much beyond the current C-class: Rory as a character was never much developed, so there isn't much to go on. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for responding. You would definitely know better than me, just thought I would ask since it looked to be fairly developed. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]