Talk:Roman influence in Caucasian Albania

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Azerbaijan Mid‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Armenia Low‑importance

	Roman influence in Caucasian Albania is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Caucasia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caucasia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CaucasiaWikipedia:WikiProject CaucasiaTemplate:WikiProject CaucasiaCaucasia articles

Untitled

The area of actual Azerbaijan occupied by Armenian forces should be included in the article? The Amaras Monastery is to be considered in Armenia?--6graytrucks (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What Azebaijan, there was no Azerbaijan in roman times, the article should be renamed Caucasian Albania without Azerbaijan. Maybe we should write Italian Empire (Roman Empire). Hardly.--2492BC (talk) 12:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Banned users

The two users having a conversation above are both banned, and so is User:Qyork who performed the move to the Azerbaijan title. I moved it to Roman influence in Caucasian Albania which should be more sane given that the main article is called Caucasian Albania. Have mörser, will travel (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roman influence

What Roman influence, at the time when Armenia was baptized by Gregory the Illuminator in 301 AD, who wasn't from Rome was pagan. The sentence must be corrected.--Armenia Magna (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roman influence in modern-day Azerbaijan is practically non-existent. Christianity is a minority religion and was not brought by the Roman Empire since it was not a Christian state when it held Caucasian Albania as a vassal. And the Latin alphabet currently used in Azerbaijan is not a legacy of Rome but of Soviet rule. If using the Latin alphabet is proof of Roman influence then one might as well talk of Roman influence on Vietnam or Indonesia. I have edited the article accordingly, but I fear it will eventually be edited back by whoever wrote that nonsense.89.121.160.79 (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman influence in Caucasian Albania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081007230439/http://1911encyclopedia.org/Albania%2C_Caucasus to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Albania,_Caucasus

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issues

This article contains numerous factual errors, some of which are loaded with OR. I've adressed several of them, by removing/tweaking the most ludicrous statements, and those that were tagged for a long time. However there's still lots to be done. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]