Talk:Roland Hartley House

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Photo gallery

I have restored the photo gallery. Rather than deleting content, I suggest editors expand the content and then size and distribute the images throughout the expanded article. I have added the NRHP nomination as a reference and information to expand the article is available there. If there is a more concise and appropriate way to include the images until the article is expanded that would be preferable. MrBill3 (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MrBill3, I removed the gallery per WP:GALLERY and agree, the images are great but should be incorporated throughout the article has the text is expanded. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think images greatly increase the information a reader can gain. Particularly in illustrating an architectural description. WP:Gallery "a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images." I have paraphrased quite a few building descriptions and I can verify if a paraphrasing is architecturally accurate but it is sometimes difficult to visualize, even with some experience. For a "lay" reader images of architectural details convey the aforementioned "aspects of a subject". I think thus galleries for NRHP buildings are in compliance with policy.

Another Believer, I present this argument here thinking after our discussion I'd like to go to the NRHP project talk page and see about establishing a local consensus for appropriate galleries for NRHP articles. I agree and would prefer expanded prose with images sized and placed well. I am not quite crafting clear, precise and engaging galleries and would rather see an improvement in gallery form that would be an basic exemplar than deletion. I appreciate your contributions and input. Pointers to policy are particularly useful, as a rusty but experienced editor I like to start with P&G for uniformity and not to reinvent the wheel. Best. MrBill3 (talk) 15:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Append: Without the images the way the article stands a reader would have very little information on the subject of the article. The information conveyed by the photos is specific to the subject and is not present in the article in another form. MrBill3 (talk) 07:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]