Jump to content

Talk:Rockefeller Capital Management

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source analysis

[edit]

I have anlaysed the references in this permalink to the best of my ability in the table below. I have been unable to see the elements that are behind paywalls, and leave that to others to assess FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table: prepared by User:Timtrent
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.thestreet.com/investing/greg-fleming-gets-rockefellers-ceo-job-14335605 Yes The Street is independent Yes External commentary Yes However, a lengthy and decent reference e is beimng used to verify a tiny fact, right at the end Yes
https://rcm.rockco.com/contact-us/ No Org's own site No Org's own site No A list of stuff No
https://www.ft.com/content/e311b324-a923-11e7-ab55-27219df83c97 Yes FT is independent ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Unknown
https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-morgan-stanley-executive-to-run-rockefeller-family-office-1507109581 Yes WSJ is independent ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Unknown
https://www.barrons.com/articles/rockefeller-capital-management-opens-chasing-100-billion-1519929547 ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall, but feels liek a PR piece ? Behind a paywall ? Unknown
https://www.businessinsider.com/rockefeller-capital-greg-fleming-recruiting-expansion-strategy-2020-7?r=US&IR=T ~ Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Unknown
https://www.businessinsider.com/rockefeller-management-acquires-greer-anderson-capital-2018-10?r=US&IR=T Yes oddly, appears to be ref 6, but with no paywall and a different title ? Feels very PR like Yes Substantial verbiage ? Unknown
https://www.businessinsider.com/rockefeller-capital-management-whitnell-wealth-management-midwest-expansion-2021-1?r=US&IR=T ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Behind a paywall ? Unknown
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3649080-associated-banc-corp-divests-wealth-management-subsidiary-whitnell-to-rockefeller-capital No Press release material and Behind a paywall No Press release material and Behind a paywall No very few bullet pointed comments No
https://observer.com/2019/09/rockefeller-family-office-acquire-silicon-valley-investment-firm/ No Press release No Press release Yes Press release No
https://citywireusa.com/registered-investment-advisor/news/rockefeller-to-buy-1-4bn-chicago-area-ria/a1446600 No Regurgitated reworked press release No Regurgitated reworked press release Yes Regurgitated reworked press release No
https://rcm.rockco.com/global-family-office/ No Org's own web site No Org's own web site No Org's own web site and negligible coverage No
https://www.euromoney.com/article/b1cy15c39280xx/wealth-management-the-next-generation ~ interviews with many folk imn the sector Yes has an aura of reliability No A string of passing mentions in interviews with Fleming. No
https://www.unepfi.org/member/rockefeller-capital-management/ ~ UN is independent No A corporate profile as penned by the PR team No Just a corporate flannel panel No
https://citywireamericas.com/news/rockefeller-enters-offshore-fund-market-with-double-launch/a1231436 No Press release material No Press release material Yes Press release material No
https://www.environmentalleader.com/2021/01/bloomberg-and-rockefeller-asset-management-launch-esg-improvers-index/ No Press release material No Press release material Yes Press release material No
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/audio/2020-11-25/greg-fleming-on-shaping-wall-street-podcast No Interview with the principal No Interview with the principal Yes Interview with the principal No
https://rcm.rockco.com/our-people/ No Org;'s own website No Org;'s own website ~ Org;'s own website No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

The notability hangs, for me, on the elements behind paywalls that I have been unable to inspect. Pinging DGG who has an interest in this draft. Please note that this analysis is my own opinion, and is a subjective analysis unless and until modified and/or ratified by oyther editors in good standing.

My firm advice is to remove anything that even feels like a PR piece, if necessary removing also the alleged fact it purports to reference. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 13:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion coming tomorrow. As usual, we mostly but not completely agree--we look with slightly different concerns,& I think I can get to some of the paywalled articles. DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement is good. It means that eventual thoughts are better because of it. I can be persuaded by good arguments, as can you. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 14:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Significant coverage

[edit]

For your consideration, here is a list of some full articles in major publications I have found.

Extended content

--TerryBG (talk) 01:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TerryBG Please read and understand WP:RS. Further reading is at WP:RSP. Please understand PR and Press Release material, whether issued verbatim or rehashed or regurgitated in some manner, adds precisely nothing to WP:N. Recognising PR material is very easy. I used to write a great deal of it professionally. Anything that even feels like PR does not belong on any list of potentially useful sources FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 21:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]