Talk:Robo Aleste

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File:BeepMD_JP_1993-01.pdf&page=137 (Dennin Aleste 2)
https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File%3ABeepMD_JP_1993-02.pdf&page=36 (Dennin Aleste 2)
https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File:Mdfan_JP_1993-02.pdf&page=83 (Dennin Aleste 2)
https://retrocdn.net/index.php?title=File:MarukatuMD_JP_05.pdf&page=137 (Dennin Aleste 2)
https://www.abandonware-magazines.org/affiche_mag.php?mag=63&num=1339&album=oui
https://www.timeextension.com/guides/best-sega-cd-games-of-all-time?page=2

Story

The story explanation is copied verbatim from the Robo Aleste instruction booklet. Is this legal and/or acceptable? I've seen it done in other articles, but I want to make sure. If it is acceptable, should I make a note about it under the text?

PiccoloNamek 00:03, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

As it currently stands (with no credit to the fact that it is a verbatim copy), absolutely not. And even if it did acknowledge that it was a verbatim copy, it's not a very good one. Nifboy 05:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting rid of that, I've been meaning to do it for a very long time, I've just never been able to get around to it. I added back when I was dumb.PiccoloNamek 14:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]