Talk:Road space rationing
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mbhushan21.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Scope
[edit]Can I suggest that the scope for this article should be 'any non-financial method of reducing capacity for applicable vehicles. This will fit nicely with the Road pricing article which covers all financial means of reducing demand. Currently the lead implies (eventually) that the only method that is used is based on number-plates. What about physical methods, such as pavement build-outs, conversion of road to cycle lanes or by pedestrianisation, bus-lanes (at certain times, or at all times) etc. Also road entry restrictions for motorised traffic which discourage traffic within a zone. Are these not also 'rationing' systems? PeterEastern (talk) 20:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Peter, as you can check by yourself the examples provided (and the article in Spanish has much more content, you can translate it with Google), the subject of the article is indeed restricted to actual implementations of rationing through plate numbers or any other method. Furthermore, this policy is an alternative to congestion pricing (not road pricing, which includes several other policies). So I do think it would be original research to expand other measures such as the ones you listed. Besides, such measures are already covered by existing articles such as traffic calming, low-emission zone, segregated cycle facilities, etc. And by the way, I liked the banner/explanation you provided in the top of the article. Cheers.--Mariordo (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Mariordo. You may well be right to leave traffic calming, low-emission zone, segregated cycle facilities etc out of scope. I have no problem with that. However it probably be good to describe the 'other methods' of rationing that you refer to in the lead. Personally I found the lead over-detailed on the theories of externalities and discussions about oil price changes and short on details of how the schemes actually work; the only examples given in the lead relate to number plates. Fyi, my main focus is on the road pricing article. My interest in this article is purely to ensure that they fit together well and we avoid too much duplication. PeterEastern (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Road space rationing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/xinhua-news-agency/150320/france-restrict-vehicles-use-monday-unless-air-pollution-eas
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/olympics/benefits-environment.jsp
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=4197
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)