Jump to content

Talk:Ringerike Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRingerike Line has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 10, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ringeriksbanen railway would reduce rail travel from Oslo to Bergen, Norway by 60 km (37 mi)?

I believe this article is worthy of GA status, however due to me being relitvly new to wikipedia i would like a second opinion. If there is no second opinion in a couple of days i will pass it myself. Canadakid2 (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your review? (I look for things like {{GAList}} on the review page.) —Rob (talk) 22:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ringeriksbanen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. I will be reviewing this article. Canadakid2 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review by User:Lpangelrob

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    "made presidency over distance reductions." - probably not what the intended meaning was. "Took precedence", perhaps? Why is "more" italicized? A minor spacing issue in the final paragraph.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The first two paragraphs in History are uncited; I'm assuming they're related to current ref [12].
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    The image in the infobox needs a caption in English - I don't know what it's saying otherwise.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Very good summary of the subject, just needs a nip and tuck here and there. —Rob (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank your for the review. All matters should have been seen to now. Arsenikk (talk) 00:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I made a couple further edits, but now it looks good. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 03:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ringerike Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ringerike Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ringerike_Line&oldid=1201141974"