Talk:Right 2 Dream Too

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Right 2 Dream Too article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

205.153.50.134 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Multnomah County. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Special:Diff/1096817357

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the organization has been mentioned in the press enough to warrant an article. The article simply needs to be expanded further. Thank you. --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restoring the article so the deletion could be contested. A simply Google search yields hundreds of results, including numerous newspaper sources. Please do not delete this article and let it remain here for future expansion. I hope to expand the article in the near future. --Another Believer _(Talk) 19:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...etc., etc. --Another Believer _(Talk) 19:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted because it demonstrates notability with two solid verifiable sources. Moreover, the article is in the midst of a public policy debate which is sure to increase its visibility and generate plenty of heat. —EncMstr (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was the one to apply the speedy deletion request a couple of weeks ago. Which was an incorrect decision based on the number of reliable sources.

However, I still have doubts concerning the notability. These kinds of occupy actions took place all over the world. This article is focussing on a Portland, Oregon case in detail. Which is local in nature, something which your mentioned sources show. This makes it somewhat harder to comply with WP:NONPROFIT criteria.

I believe this page was somewhat similar in scope: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necessity Village.

Maybe someone could make this article seem more notable.

Crispulop (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Another Believer _(Talk) 14:45, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

R2D2 and Dignity Village are under the umbrella of the same parent organization Right 2 Survive. On the national scale, I feel like it doesn't warrant a page for each cutesy named transient encampment, but rather consolidate them all into a section as city sanctioned transient camps. Graywalls (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graywalls, There's likely enough coverage of both R2D2 and Dignity Village to justify standalone article. I'm not opposed to having one for Right 2 Survive as well, if you think there's enough coverage. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if they're of enough substance to warrant separate articles regardless of number of coverage. Controversial issues are bound to have series of follow-up articles locally but the summarized contents probably don't have enough to merit separate pages. I feel the same way about neighborhoods too. There's likely not enough substance to warrant each of 95 neighborhoods regardless of how many sources you can find that reference each one. Graywalls (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graywalls, Sure, well, just for the record I support having entries for R2D2, Dignity Village, and Portland's neighborhoods. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, for example, this one is a sentence. Sabin,_Portland,_Oregon. Probably would be better served being sub-categorized within the next largest cluster, such as NE. Ideally. I can't be bothered with it though. Graywalls (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graywalls, I disagree. The article should be kept and expanded, but let's not discuss other articles here. Happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI

An edit from an IP belonging to the County of Multnomah was detected. I suspect potential COI, because, a program called Joint Office supports Right 2 Dream Too, per https://www.multco.us/johs/alternative-shelters . That program belongs to the county per https://www.portlandmercury.com/news/2023/05/26/46527557/city-leaders-lambast-joint-office-of-homeless-services-call-for-heightened-budget-scrutiny together with the edit summary "clarified what we do" at Special:Diff/1096817357 collectively rise to suspected COI editing. Graywalls (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]