Talk:Right-wing anarchism
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Definition of anarchism and libertarianism Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Definition of anarchism and libertarianism |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger to Issues in anarchism#Left and right anarchism
[edit]@Czar: Would you support also moving this to Issues in anarchism#Left and right anarchism, as with Left anarchism? It falsely gives the impression that anarchism could be a right-wing ideology, when reliable sources refer to it as left-wing. It's also just anarcho-capitalism and national-anarchism, two ideologies which are also not considered part of anarchism, notwithstanding the name. I don't consider anarcho-conservatism because it has no page, besides obvious reasons; what's next, anarcho-fascism?
@North8000: @Pfhorrest: Now that's what something that needs to be merged look like. I couldn't find anything on Google Scholar related to it. Also, it's even shorter than Left anarchism that simply redirecting to the appropriate section in Issues in anarchism in this case makes sense.--Davide King (talk) 06:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- I support this merge proposal. —Pfhorrest (talk) 07:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- I support this merge as well. Right now it's halfway between an article and a disambiguation page, but does neither of those well (nor could it with the lack of scholarly sources referred to above.--MattMauler (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- @MattMauler: @Pfhorrest: I don't know if this can be considered a consensus or whether we should wait more, but I tried to be bold and have moved it. If there's any issue, you can write here and discuss it.--Davide King (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, and if anyone objects later they can always revert and discuss. Thanks for being bold! --Pfhorrest (talk) 00:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- @MattMauler: @Pfhorrest: I don't know if this can be considered a consensus or whether we should wait more, but I tried to be bold and have moved it. If there's any issue, you can write here and discuss it.--Davide King (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)