Talk:Reviews on the Run

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Redirect, 24 April 2022, see discussion.
keep, 11 February 2008, see discussion.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision

Video games

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Name Change

I vote we change the name to "Reviews on the Run", since the show no longer uses the "Judgment Day" name. -- VederJuda 20:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say just go ahead and do it. It seems that it's only known as Judgment Day in the U.S. and as Reviews on the Run everywhere else. Even though I'm from the U.S. and originally knew of the show as Judgment Day I agree that the article should have the more widely used name. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 15:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, especially since when the show returns to the US, it will be called "Reviews on the Run" --Elwood00 ^{T | C} 15:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 18:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Even though I like the name Judgement Day more, I agree with this change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.146.99.140 (talk • contribs)

Oh God, I hope this doesn't come back to the US. Shouldn't this article have a section about criticisms? Like how they don't review games on the show, they just give their personal opinions? The show sucks in general, but that's just my opinion. But the fact that they admittedly don't give fair reviews ought to be mentioned somewhere. 68.181.224.25 20:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you can source it. Perhaps you should review the show rather than just give your personal opinion. ;) 75.16.230.111 (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JD whole.png

Image:JD whole.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abdi-malli Omar?

Sorry, maybe I missed the episode, but it sounds like someone edited that one in as a prank.. - NemFX (talk) 03:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

status of new episode production is needed

The status on whether the show is still in production is needed without original research. It's still airing, but are they still producing it? --Jack Zhang (talk) 20:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

This article really needs a Infobox. Henshin86 (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arkham Asylum

It appears someone removed Arkham Asylum from the Double 10s. It was originally given 9.5 and 10 but it was reviewed again for the PC and received two 10s. Scott even said he felt bad for giving it a 9.5 originally. I've included the link to the review if there are any more doubters. JaziB (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-DIFFERENT POSTER- I second this.

On the Nov. 20 recap show, they looked back at the Arkham Asylum console version (the one that Scott gave 9.5). On that show, he said he wanted to change his score to a 10. So in that case, the unofficial score for Batman Arkham Asylum for the consoles is a Double 10. Would it be appropriate to add it to the Double 10 section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.6.100 (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes....it's there. I originally added it to the table, then it was removed by someone, and I re-inserted it again. I suppose it is the unofficial score for the consoles but I indicated that it was the PC version that received the 10s so I think it should be left as it is. JaziB (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redesign

The show has received a major redesign in it's logos, designs, ect. Could somebody please change the logo to represent the current one, and make a section about the redesign? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.52.10 (talk) 19:36, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When and where did the show first air in Canada?

I realize that with the show long over, this likely won't get any attention, but I figure it's worth a shot. Does anyone know which channel the series first aired on in Canada? Because it was made by an independent producer, both Reviews on the Run and Electric Playground have a convoluted broadcast history spread over broadcast syndication and multiple cable channels. It was my understanding that the Reviews on the Run episodes were repackaged for the U.S. as Judgment Day and not vice versa. I'm having a really hard time finding a Canadian broadcast date before the U.S. one, which was sometime in May 2002.

CHUM

CKVR, the flagship New/A Channel/CTV2 station, started running the show on September 27, 2003.
Space debuted it on October 5, 2003.
MTV Canada (now MTV2) launched the show on September 5, 2004. As the article notes, this continued with the channel's Razer re-brand, as ROTR started airing under the era on June 3, 2005 (CRTC link here).

Rogers

Tech TV Canada began airing the show on December 2, 2003. Supported by the log submitted to the CRTC, as well as the channel's own website.
As the article states, Omni.1 on January 28, 2007 and City TV on December 15, 2007.

So, what happened? Did the show air on another channel outside of these? Maybe a Vancouver local station since that's the show's hometown? Was the show not originally produced for Canada? Was ROTR first aired internationally (like in Australia) or was the Judgment Day version actually the original format? Maybe I should ask Victor Lucas himself ... - Damnedfan1234 (talk)