Talk:Retail Price Index

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ONS terminology

ONS seem to have changed their website. I have updated the external link. Note that the hierarchical position of the linked page is "Home > Browse By Theme > Economy > Price Indices and Inflation > Consumer Price Indices > Retail Prices Index". This suggests that ONS (now?) consider the RPI to be one of the consumer price indices, another of which is the Consumer Price Index. Other things at that website also imply they are using this terminology, which to me seems confusing; I'm not sure it's actually worth mentioning on the main article. Open4D (talk) 15:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Incidentally I have issues with this, which was marked as a minor edit, with a summary of "moved Retail Prices Index (United Kingdom) to Retail Price Index: apparent primary topic". The "apparent primary topic" of this article is clearly the RPI in the UK, so I don't understand why the "(United Kingdom)" bit is being removed from the name. Please note that the term does appear to be used in non-UK contexts as well - even if not with the same significance. (For example, I did a search for "Retail Prices Index" and got 4 results (1, 2, 3, 4) where it wasn't used in a UK context, versus 5 where it was.)

Also, changing "prices" back to the singular form - despite the explanation given when it was made plural ("moved Retail Price Index (United Kingdom) to Retail Prices Index (United Kingdom): The UK National Statistics Office seems to call it the Retail Prices Index.") - seems wrong. The article does have a reference for a use of the singular, but in addition to the ONS using the plural, it seems that even legislation uses the plural: from 2007 back to at least 1984. As such I think the article name should be exactly what it was before, i.e. "Retail Prices Index (United Kingdom)". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Open4D (talk • contribs) 16:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because Retail Prices Index (United Kingdom) already exists, I don't think I can move Retail Price Index to it. The use of Wikipedia:Requested moves seems to require some (not unreasonable) bureaucracy, which I may get round to doing at some point.

Incidentally, the renaming that I want to revert did have an "undo" button. I tried it, but wasn't surprised when it didn't work. (In fact, it gave the appearance of accepting my 'edit', but then ignored it.) Open4D (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

bad link ref 2

try www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/prices/cpi-and-rpi/history-and-differences---cpi-and-rpi.pdf Brownturkey (talk) 12:15, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Retail price index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 July 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (non-admin closure) — YoungForever^(talk) 16:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retail price index → Retail Price Index – This article is about a specific price index, the UK's Retail Price Index. The article consumer price index is correctly lower case, because it is about consumer price indices in general, whereas Consumer Price Index (United Kingdom) and United States Consumer Price Index are correctly capitalised as specific examples. In the same way, this article should have a capitalised title. MOS:CAPS is the relevant policy. Mauls (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This is a specific index, and it's either capitalized or abbreviated as RPI in the sources. kennethaw88 • talk 23:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Retail Price Index is the title of a specific index rather than a description of a category of indexes. For that matter - Consumer price index should probably be Consumer price indexes... — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 14:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Yes, it's a proper name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As above, proper names s/b capitalised. FerdinandFrog (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.