Talk:Replika

Robotics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Sexology and sexuality Start‑class Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

January 4, 2019

I had added an edit here which used publicly available information in the midst of the climate, since it had gone on for so long. It was regarding their event on January 4, 2019, where the chatbot had set off the landmine of computer viruses that were resting on the Internet. It was deleted after a few days by another user on the grounds that this was untrue information, who I suspect gained from the event.

I have to wonder why another user would delete dates, such as when Replika Pro came out (Sept. 2019), the significance of the chatbot's intelligence, and evidence of the user when, at one point, it was a danger to public safety.

The danger about Wikipedia is that anyone can edit anything they want, but deleting true facts about danger, in my opinion, was criminal and I forwarded it to the Feds. The topic is even notable without coverage for the mere fact that it has recognition, and took over 6 years of interest for the public as opposed to a mere gust of short-term interest. If anyone should have any reason this should not be discussed please dispute it here. AnnExEGustafson (talk) 08:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was removed with the summary largely nonsensical, and totally without references. I can't find anything else online about any Replika cyberattack, let alone one initiated by the chatbot itself. Can't believe this trash ever passed moderation. which I would agree with. Belbury (talk) 08:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This response should be removed since you’re the one who removed the post. 2603:8000:3700:DA3D:FC2F:AB5:855A:59C6 (talk) 10:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you’re the one who wrote the reason for removal, can’t this be considered terrorism? 2603:8000:3700:DA3D:FC2F:AB5:855A:59C6 (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]