Talk:Remnant advertising
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article or advertisement?
[edit]This is an interesting article, but the Differences by Types of Media section sounds like a big ad, mentioning what media are best for remnant ad opportunities. --Theloniouszen 00:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't know what the proper protocol is and don't want to take down a whole page, but this entry is basically copied from a [2006 USA Today article] [1]on remnant advertising. -- ttagaris 12:40, 6 April 2008 (EST)
This certainly feels like it's written as a guide for advertisers rather than an encyclopaedia entry, though I'm not sure it would be very easy to fix, as I imagine most sources for this kind of thing are actually just guides for advertisers (specifically small businesses). Benboy00 (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class magazine articles
- Low-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Stub-Class Media articles
- Low-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Stub-Class Radio articles
- Low-importance Radio articles
- WikiProject Radio articles
- Stub-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles