Talk:Religious organization

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question

dontknowwhatimdoing can someone upgrade this page? i'm really interested in this topic and would like to know more — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.242.203.192 (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Religion-supporting organization → Religious organization – Much more recognizable term. JFH (talk) 18:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support; seems sensible enough to me. bobrayner (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move and scope

This move should be reflected by a change in scope. The original article [1] referred specifically to France and the USA, while the current version [2] deals in detail with France, the reference to the USA having been removed.

The new name suggests to me a much wider scope not just in the countries covered but in the types of institutions covered too. I could be wrong. Andrewa (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]