Jump to content

Talk:Redding, California/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Notability of Non-academic learning section

The inclusion of both Code IT and Build It in the list of educational resources is questionable. There was a discussion or something about them awhile back as not relevant and I think they should be again. As to me they are akin to a private dare care or something. Which really shouldn't be listed. The same goes for the "Non-academic learning" section as a whole IMHO. Including the Redding Library entry. It's to broad a category as anything can count as "Non-academic learning." For something to qualify for being listed it should 1. Be an actually educational institution 2. Serve the main or sole purpose of education (of which the library doesn't) 3. Not be a day or after school program (as are Code IT and Build IT). Otherwise it might as well be a list of all the day care centers in Redding and anywhere that teaches a class on anything. Which totally wouldn't work and is not the purpose of the section. Therefore if there are no valid objections I am going to remove the Non-academic learning section all together. All three places mentioned in it could better be listed on WikiVoyage anyway. It's the more appropriate place for them. Or the library could be mentioned in articles prose somewhere. Especially if someone creates a Wikipedia article about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Go ahead. This article has too much unsourced material anyway. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)