Jump to content

Talk:Red Ventures

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older comments

[edit]

Red Ventures is no longer located in Charlotte, North Carolina.

In 2009, Red Ventures relocated to the 521 Corporate Center, in northern Lancaster County, South Carolina.

Jbaker314 (talk) 03:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article updated 27 May, 2010 to reflect changes in the business. Red Ventures no longer sells Sirius_Satellite_Radio, so that link was removed. Added links for HughesNet, Clear 4G WiMax, and Miracle-Ear, which are all new clients added since the previous update. Offices in Dallas, Texas and New York City have been closed.

Rturnham (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deleted content

[edit]

Hello, I would like to discuss the inclusion of recognition and rankings which were recently deleted. (See diffs 794593612 and 794644674 ) The edit summary stated "very promotional", presumably implying the content violated WP policy regarding advertising. I disagree that the content meets the definition of promotional/advertising, and I strongly object to the deletion of content without discussion. However, I would like to find a consensus of what, if any, content should be included.

I believe the following should be retained in the article

  • The rankings of the company and it's growth rate are very relevant to the company's history and should be included. (refs: [1][2][3][4])
  • The awards/recognition should be retained in the corporate culture section. Perhaps the added sentence: Correspondingly, Red Ventures has been repeatedly recognized by Charlotte based newspapers for it's corporate culture.[5][6][7][8][9]

I look forward to the discussion. Dbsseven (talk) 16:23, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.redventures.com/images/pdf/rv_presskit_aug08.pdf
  2. ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2007
  3. ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, November 1, 2004
  4. ^ “Inc. 500: America’s Fastest Growing Private Companies”, Inc. Magazine, September 2008
  5. ^ "Red Ventures on the Forbes America's Best Midsize Employers List". Forbes. Retrieved 2017-03-06.
  6. ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2011", Charlotte Business Journal, November 10, 2011
  7. ^ "Charlotte's Best Places to Work 2010", Charlotte Business Journal, November 4, 2010
  8. ^ ”Companies honored as Best Places to Work”, Charlotte Business Journal, November 5, 2008
  9. ^ "Large companies, No. 1 - Red Ventures: Benefits and career chances stand out". charlotteobserver. Retrieved 2017-03-06.

Request edit on 20 October 2022

[edit]
  • Remove Chowhound from list of brands owned and operated by Red Ventures:
  • Chowhound was closed down in March 2022:
  • New York Times ([1]):


Mcmurtrk (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Ptrnext (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Asimov, Eric (3/10/22). "Chowhound Closes After 25 Years of Food Obsession, Wisdom and Debate". New York Times. Retrieved 10/20/22. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |access-date= and |date= (help)

Information about Wikipedia itself sourced externally

[edit]

Information about Wikipedia changing Red Ventures from trusted to untrusted in citations is weirdly cited only to an external site claiming that this happened . There's no citation or link to that alleged decision within a Wikimedia foundation website .

This looks suspect . 77.213.208.88 (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's suspect. It's confirmed at WP:CNET. Since Wikipedia is being discussed, i don't think citing the Wikimedia foundation would strictly be disallowed, but it's probably still better to use a secondary source rather than a primary one. Godheadlouse (talk) 03:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]