Talk:Recipe for Murder (film)

Australia: Crime / Cinema / Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Recipe for Murder (film) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Film: Australian / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Requested move 07 January 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recipe for Murder (film) → Recipe for Murder – Only article of this name. Bracketed disambiguator not needed. Gibson Flying V (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Oppose multiple topics which occur in articles on Wikipedia about things called "Recipe for Murder" exist. Disambiguation page should be the primary landing point -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

There is already a different topic at the target name. There are also several other candidate topics on Wikipedia. We should create a dab page and try to determine whether there is a primary topic here or not. Is it clear that this one-hour TV docudrama is more notable than the CSI episode? —BarrelProof (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not, but a hatnote should take care of that. I just thought that forcing the only article of its name into having a bracketed disambiguator because of re-direct to a 40-minute CSI episode not notable enough to have standalone article seemed a bit odd.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia already mentioned the Ridley play in Whodunit article and was mislinking to the Australian 2011 TV docudrama as a result. I have created a dab from what was a CSI redirect as BarrelProof suggests. This proposal therefore now requires the dab be moved to Recipe for Murder (disambiguation) if the 2011 Australian TV docudrama is really judged WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. I'm satisfied now with the status quo.--Gibson Flying V (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - sorry no, a quick look in Google books doesn't suggest that the Australian TV docudrama is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, if anything the Arnold Ridley 1932 play or Vincent Starrett 1934 story would contest for that spot, I would even be inclined to add (2011 film) to the dab, searches produce the 2002 American TV film as much as the 2011 Australian TV film. Once an article is dabbed it is best to have full not partial disambiguation per WP:CRITERIA. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.