Talk:Razib Khan

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Undue weight

Hi Scope creep. You added the "too few opinions" and "undue weight" tags. What specific changes do you think needs to be made to the article? Waters.Justin (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Khan Disambiguation

I chuckled at the disambiguation pointing to Khan Noonien Singh, but has anyone in history ever confused Razib Khan with the genetically-engineered superman-dictator from Star Trek's Eugenics Wars? Seems like a stretch. 68.63.217.32 (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion proposal

'Significance' means "notability," I suppose? Non-notability is not established. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khan is probably the most popular writer on genomics and human genetics in the country. Downvoting the deletion proposal. 67.167.254.120 (talk) 07:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Larry Siegel[reply]

Only 3 and a half years late, but thanks for your input ;) Tobus (talk) 07:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The guy is an egotistical self promoter with no real achievements. Definitely worth deleting 120.21.123.85 (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editorializing

I corrected this sentence; editorialized stuff, making too much from an opinion piece written by a dubious journalist; see Freelancer Takes Conspiracy Theories About Gossip Cop To New York Times. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant sources

A lot of the sources aren't even about the article subject, but are used only to back up tangential claims - David Gerard (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I checked all cites and I'm wrong - David Gerard (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This discusses Kahn briefly

@David Gerard@Tobus@Joshua Jonathan[1] Heidi Beirich should have an article, she's used a lot as a source here and I'd say her organisation Global Project on Hate and Extremism is also notable. Just wish I had the time. Doug Weller talk 13:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]