Jump to content

Talk:Ralph Abernathy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRalph Abernathy has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 4, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ralph Abernathy (pictured), mentor and friend of Martin Luther King Jr., led a demonstration protesting the use of federal funds for the Apollo 11 project when many Americans lived in poverty?
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 11, 2018, April 17, 2023, March 11, 2024, and April 17, 2024.

Book

[edit]

I think some of the events surrounding his book would be very good to have mentioned. A very important contribution and part of his life is being left out. Ralph Abernathy was the 12th president of Africa in the 1800's. He was the first person to ever have Ebola.

Image

[edit]

While I'm sure some would see it as a badge of honor, couldn't anyone find something other than a mug shot for his photo?

There wasn't a photo there at all a few days ago. Ah, well, you have a point, I guess. Here goes. AnonEMouse 16:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph vs. Ralph David

[edit]

Searching "Ralph David Abernathy" redirects to this page. This page is about his father, Ralph Abernathy. The top of the page also says "Ralph David Abernathy". Which is it? This needs to be fixed and clarified... 65.104.203.83 (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

[edit]

The tone in the section on civil rights work is not written encyclopedically. It is written like a speech, with excessive analogies, paralellism, and loaded language. Instead of paraphrasing Abernathy's talking points with his own achievements, the article should include more quotes as well as citations (as has been mentioned). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.107.83 (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree. While I think that Abernathy was a very important person who did a massive amount to improve the world, I still think that the article should have a much more neutral tone and allow the facts to speak for themselves. When reading through the article, I was shocked by the intensity with which that section (which contains a grand total of 1 citations) feels as though it's praising Abernathy. I went through the revision history to see how it got that way, and found that it was mainly done over a handful of edits in 2009 by an anonymous editor (76.214.17.104) whose only contributions are to this page. While it feels ridiculous to criticize bias in favor of civil rights, I still do think that this kind of tone should be avoided. I've added a "tone" tag to that section, and I've begun trying to make it more neutral, partly by reincorporating passages deleted years ago by that editor. BreakfastJr (talk) 10:37, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ralph Abernathy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ralph Abernathy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 20:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

It's been awhile since I've read about Abernathy and I hadn't known much about his later life so I'm looking forward to diving into this article. I am still new a GA reviews so I look forward to working together on this article. I will make my way through the criterion over the next few days.

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Given the (totally reasonable length of the WP:Lead, it feels like some citations would be useful. At minimum the grave quote needs a citation. Other elements might also benefit from one (which would admittedly look a bit lonely).
     Fixed grave quote cited — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 16:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    This article has some really strong sourcing. I was unable to access all materials but uniformly what I could access via web or other ways was high quality and corresponded clearly to what was being cited.
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
    See comments below for issues with weight.
    Will review then comment below. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Given the relatively recent nature of Abernathy it feels like there could be more images out there. A quick search of WikiCommons suggests there is at least one picture of Abernathy and King which might fit into this article given their joint work.
     Fixed Image added. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Reviewer Comments and Thoughts

[edit]

Observations as I do an intensive read through of the article:

Lead

[edit]

Early life, family, and education

[edit]
Perhaps edit to "after his birth on August 16 while the rest of Abernathy's children lived to adulthood." After clicking on the link to Ralph David Abernathy III that page is a disaster but thoughts on including a sentence about him here? Barkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Rights Activism

[edit]
  • Suggestion: "The 381-day transit boycott, challenging the "Jim Crow" segregation laws, had been successful at desegregating the buses and n December 20, 1956, the boycott came to an end."
 DoneBarkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clarify that King never regain consciousness at hospital.
 DoneBarkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stopping here for now. Will resume when time permits. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a heading for Media Appearances in the middle of this section describing Abernathy's civil rights involvement? Michael Young Username (talk) 04:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Probably worth mentioning that the march for Sanitation workers was a continuation of the work that occurred when King was assassinated
  • The amount of detail in Leadership of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference is inconsistent. Does his encounter at NASA really deserve several times the length of the Poor People's Campaign? It's of enough historical weight that it might deserve its own subsection (and it seems like the content could be fairly easily sourced from the PPC's article which on a quick glance appears solid)
  • I don't understand how Abernathy was able to negotiate a peace if the FBI thought he might cause a violent uprising
    • You have to recall that the FBI also suspected MLK and other peaceful protestors/activists as "potential threats" as well... just because the FBI thought he was a potential cause to an uprising that didn't occur, it doesn't make it so. The sources in the article and elsewhere online make it appear clear that he did indeed play a part in the peace being found in the midst of the incident. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's totally fair but as worded suggests the reason why he was able to make peace was because the FBI thought he'd do a violent uprising. Is this correct? I'm not quite sure of what the whole context is so I'm having a hard time coming up with a suggested alternative but one such version (if historically accurate) might be: "and the Leaders of the American Indian Movement, Russell Means and Dennis Banks, despite the FBI's concerns that outsiders like Abernathy might cause a violent uprising." Barkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Fixed — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Political career and later activism=

[edit]
  • Is there evidence to support that And the Walls was Abernathy's final accounting?
  • I would suggest use of the n word doesn't meet the WP:OM burden that there is "no equally suitable alternative is available." Suggested change: "to protest the news media's use of the term "Moonies", which they compared to a racial slur." This might not be strong enough but want to put ot there for discussion.
    • There were many racial slurs used back then, and in this case I don't find the singular use of the word (as is done in the sourcing) so offensive that it should not be included for clarity for the reader. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 16:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
After re-reading artcle, source, and WP:OM I'm still not sure I agree but will defer to you as article's editor and subject mastery.  Done Barkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy and Awards

[edit]
I really do feel like a section on his Legacy would be beneficial. However, I'm not strictly sure it's needed to be a GA (though would be for FA) and this tributes section works nicely for what it is.  Done Barkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That ends my read through. Will comment on areas not covered by this reading of the article next.

@Coffee: thanks for your further work on this. Believe we're close. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Barkeep49: Think I got everything good to go now... but please feel free to let me know if I missed anything! — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 10:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ralph_Abernathy&oldid=1256745145"