Talk:Rajjaprabha Dam
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 25 November 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved as uncontroversial by RHaworth. (Since nobody objected to the move, I tagged the target for G6 deletion and the page has since been moved. Closing after the fact.) (non-admin closure) Paul_012 (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Ratchaprapa Dam → Rajjaprabha Dam – Preferred spelling Paul_012 (talk) 02:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- By who? Please provide a reliable source or naming convention to support your proposal. Jenks24 (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- By the Electrecity Generating Authority of Thailand, who operates the dam,[1] as well as several book sources as shown in Google Books.[2] --Paul_012 (talk) 03:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- By who? Please provide a reliable source or naming convention to support your proposal. Jenks24 (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- AlexTW 04:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- AlexTheWhovian, would you care to elaborate on why you contested the request? --Paul_012 (talk) 04:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The redirect to an appropriate section was reverted, so a requested move was required. I have no opinion on the article. -- AlexTW 05:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I follow. If you're not disputing the spelling, the move itself should be uncontroversial. Whether to have this as a separate article or to merge/redirect should be a separate discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The redirect to an appropriate section was reverted, so a requested move was required. I have no opinion on the article. -- AlexTW 05:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Lake name ? ? ?
[edit]So, does the lake formed by the dam have a name ?
None is mentioned nor hinted at in the article.2600:8800:204:C400:2089:13FA:A3F1:5870 (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)