Jump to content

Talk:Rail transport in Japan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why so punctual?

[edit]

What are the major reasons that the Japanese rail system is so punctual compared to other rail lines around the world? --voodoom (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1067 mm

[edit]

The history section (and the related main article) totally neglect to mention that almost all government track built before 1938 was in 1067 mm, the smaller size carriages being appropriate for the on average smaller passengers of the day. --Zenwort 12:40, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Railroad companies charging families of suicide jumpers

[edit]

Japanese railroad companies do no charge the families of suicide jumpers. This is an urban myth. The cited reference is irrelevant: It leads to a page in Japanese that discusses the damages caused by suicides, but not whether families are charged. --Rschnoeck (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to read the article more thoroughly. It sets out to find out whether it is an urban myth, and while most operating companies were unwilling to reveal publicly how they handle damages caused by suicides, Keikyu revealed that their policy was to charge families for damages - usually not exceeding 1 million yen. --DAJF (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback. I still think that "although families are often charged or sued by the railway companies to compensate for the trouble caused by the accident" is wrong. While companies reserve the right to claim damages, I could not find a source saying that this ever happened. One case where a dementia patient wandered off on the tracks was publiciyed, but this concerns negligence of a guardian, and not suicide. The announcement by Keikyu in the article also does not refer to suicides. Rschnoeck (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rail transport in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]