Talk:Radar chart

Statistics Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Visualization.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Chloe Musick (29 September 2022). "OHIO students place first, second and third in international Wikipedia editing competition". Ohio University. Explore the winning teams' Wikipedia articles in Radar Charts (first place), Biological Networks (second place) and Cosegregration (third place).

Time

How about discussion and examples of cyclical data such as temperature by day of month or hour of day? AndrewHZ (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good point – thanks! I’ve added a discussion and references in this edit.

—Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name?

Where does this "kiviat diagram" name come from? DS (talk) 12:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. First I thought I read it in the given source: Michael Friendly's "Star Plots - Statistical Graphics for Multivariate Data" but I didn't. It was add here Aug 2008 by an anon. The "kiviat diagram" is an existing type of diagram, but I can't yet find a source that links the both. I will keep looking. If you know more, please let me know? -- Mdd (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed, see here, the use of an other alternative name: "cobweb". -- Mdd (talk) 00:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The controversy of Spider Charts as a valid medium is not suitably discussed

My view of Spider Charts is that they are an attempt to create a new chart type where one is not needed. Data can be displayed in a more parsimonious way using bar or line charts. Spider Charts over complicate the presentation and are often used to blind the audience into submission. Furthermore they are subject to the issues of scale magnitude (weight) and nominal category ordering. I do not think Spider Charts are serious or robust statistical display techniques and this article needs a healthy dose of skepticism to readdress the balance. 194.176.105.145 (talk) 08:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Radar charts are controversial

Radar charts are controversial as they are very often misused. I do not consider them to be a serious statistical tool. I think this article needs to be more balanced by providing a substantial criticism of them.194.176.105.145 (talk) 10:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Radar chart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100325233432/http://processtrends.com:80/TOC_data_visualization.htm to http://processtrends.com/toc_data_visualization.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Examples

The detail of the star plot of the Cadillac Seville has the axis in the opposite direction to the other example containing multiple plots.

This highlights the kind of error that can be made comparing multiple graphs of this type. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.15.100.212 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plotly

Does the article need such an extensive advert for Plotly in it? Star-one (talk) 06:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radar chart

What is radar chart 84.255.184.163 (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Figure references

There is a reference to figure 5, but in my wikipedia settings the figures don't appear clearly labelled as such. Dbague (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]