Talk:Rachel Mitchell
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rachel Mitchell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
02:29, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Neling4 (talk)
Start
[edit]Started stub--Aboudaqn (talk) 14:53, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:21, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Image
[edit]@Walk Like an Egyptian: Thanks for uploading an image to Commons of Christine Blasey Ford. Might you be able to upload an image of Rachel Mitchell as well? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Yup, here's the image. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Definitely keep it.
[edit]This confirmation process is historic. All who contributed should be included. Her contribution was important. Her conclusions were illuminating, to say the least.
Neling4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neling4 (talk • contribs) 02:27, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed. Volvlogia (talk) 16:06, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
KEEP IT! Wikipedia's deletion policy is a leftist farce! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.34.12.23 (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Criticism of her memo to the committee
[edit]An editor had posted material on the criticism of Mitchell's memo to the committee. This was removed by another editor as poorly crafted. I added back a sentence on the criticism as an important aspect of the event.Bjhillis (talk) 20:03, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:10, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Department of Justice Findings of Unethical Practices
[edit]Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell was referenced in the Department of Justice's 2024 report regarding the Phoenix Police Department's civil rights violations, together with improper charging and other ethical violations by the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. The Department of Justice discussed how police and prosecutors came to invent a gang and falsely charge protesters as members. A breakout section titled ‘The Genesis of the Gang Charges,” covers MCAO’s role in the scandal and how a prosecutor lost her law license. County Attorney Rachel Mitchell called the section about her office a “lie” at a press conference hosted by police union leaders. However, Mitchell said several things about the DOJ’s report that were misleading and not true. Source: Department of Justice 2024 Report 2600:8800:7217:3900:51D3:4EA4:996B:3832 (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)