Talk:Ron Jarvis

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Requested move 26 February 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R. G. Jarvis → Ron Jarvis – The only cited source calls him Ron Jarvis, which is already a redirect to here. Dicklyon (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support WP:RECOGNIZABLE --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Looking at Google Books results there's not much in it "Ron Jarvis" 1660 results [1] versus "R. G. Jarvis" 1340 results [2] but the results for 'Ron Jarvis' look very random and don't necessarily relate to this topic. Zarcadia (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree there are not many sources for this guy; most of those are not, and the ones that are (of the R. G. Jarvis) are from paper citations, not representative of what he would be called in a context that's not so strongly styled toward initials. Dicklyon (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it looks like "Ronald Jarvis" would be an even better choice, more common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment. Needs more input about, especially with Ron v Ronald. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Ron Jarvis" per WP:COMMONNAME. It's used in the book written about him, which appears to be the best source available (and the only one cited here).--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.