Talk:Qing dynasty
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Qing dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 August 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
the Manchukuo to Manchukuo in footnote e Noob282 (talk) 10:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Done I just removed the footnote though, as I do not think it is necessary; ideally this would be explained where appropriate not hidden in a footnote cluttering the already cluttered lead. Remsense ‥ 论 11:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Impossible to link
[edit]The format of the page makes it impossible to link to subsections. Why? Is this a purposeful design (for a reason I don't understand) or a mistake that needs repairing? Metokpema (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Could you rephrase? I have no idea what specifically you're referring to. Remsense ‥ 论 21:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- please correct me if I'm wrong, but your subtitles are sub-sub-subtitles, and cannot be linked per wiki standards. Metokpema (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Military section
[edit]I know this article already has a lot written, but should there be a section briefly describing the Qing dynasty military? It's common to have that on other state articles. Romanov loyalist (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. The brief section, which appeared under "Government," was removed Here in February 2022, with no explanation. I will restore it, but would be happy to hear any further comment or suggestions for a better way to handle the matter.ch (talk) ch (talk) 01:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that should be restored immediately. Furius (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done!ch (talk) 05:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that should be restored immediately. Furius (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
- C-Class vital articles in History
- C-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- C-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- C-Class Central Asia articles
- High-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles
- C-Class former country articles
- WikiProject Former countries articles