The contents of the Manor of Upton Pyne page were merged into Pynes House on 5 October 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pynes House article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Oppose, on the grounds that the two articles are sufficiently developed to warrant separate coverage: one for the current house, and one for the history of manorialism on the estate.Klbrain (talk) 13:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, assuming that my recent removal of the vast amount of unreliably-sourced and irrelevant content from the manor article is valid. Note that the original content was added by a problematic editor (now indef. blocked) who would not abide by all WP's policies and guidelines, especially those related to sourcing and relevance. —SMALLJIM19:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]