Talk:Purussaurus

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Purussaurus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comparison with Rhamphosuchus crassidens size

I'd say it's better not citing Rhamphosuchus size, since its page says "a more recent study suggests that the animal may have been no greater than around 10 m in length, and therefore is not the largest known crocodylian": This phrase is based on Head, J. J. (2001). "Systematics and body size of the gigantic, enigmatic crocodyloid Rhamphosuchus crassidens, and the faunal history of Siwalik Group (Miocene) crocodylians". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21 (Supplement to No. 3): 59A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brisio (talk • contribs) 05:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, 10 m is still pretty big. Only the largest saltwater crocodiles today even come close to that length. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.130.109 (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No saltwater crocodile has ever been measured at 10m long, they are just fish stories and tall tales, people don't understand how ridiculously huge a 10m croc will be, we are talking something as big as a full grown bull African elephant. Mike.BRZ (talk) 07:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Purussaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328083858/http://www.ufac.br/ensino/laboratorios/Paleontologia/purussaurus.htm to http://www.ufac.br/ensino/laboratorios/Paleontologia/purussaurus.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

@Magnatyrannus: IF the describing author or a secondary reliable source gives an etymological breakdown of the name Purussaurus, then a section of prose on the etymology should be added to the history section with RELIABLE citation as support. Adding an unsourced faux-etymology to the opening sentence should always be avoided.--Kev min § 18:45, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Purussaurus skull.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]