Talk:Proposed Melbourne tram extensions

Australia: Melbourne / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Proposed Melbourne tram extensions is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Proposed Melbourne tram extensions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vic.liberal.org.au/documents/public%20transport%20policy%20(cover).pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of proposed?

What defines a proposed extension? Is an individual having an idea enough? Eg: Someone wrote route 59 to the airport; I can't find any proposals for this though, but it's an idea regardless? Should it be removed? Should proposals (to be included on this page) have come from well known organisations such as Councils, Political parties and action groups only?

Do other 'Proposed' Wikipedia pages follow some sort of standard for this? I'd like to make more maps for this page, but if it's one or two people with an idea, then it's not really proposed... It's more a 'potential' idea. Beager (talk) 07:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a new heading 'potential but not proposed' and moved those ones under there. If they do become 'proposed' then they could be moved back.Beager (talk) 04:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]