Talk:Project Icarus (photography)

A fact from Project Icarus (photography) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2009 two MIT students made a vehicle to take pictures of the Earth from 93,000 feet for $148?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/September.

Wikipedia

Photography: History Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Rocketry Low‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Similar projects

[1] & [2]

Thanks for those links, and for your help with the article. Grundle2600 (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources

JBS.org, Fox25 Boston (with video), Popular Science, Seattle Times. Grsz¹¹ 04:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Grundle2600 (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Project Rocketry?

They used a balloon. How is this rocketry? Chuthya (talk) 14:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The rockets are used to deflect the asteroid. 76.66.197.151 (talk) 11:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split apart

These are two unrelated projects, they should exist in their own articles. Each seems to be of sufficient notability, what with one even being fictionalized into a major motion picture and all. 76.66.197.151 (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I just don't see why this has to be in different articles at all considering that both are projects performed by MIT. I think having one stub is better than having two stubs.—Chris!_c/t 18:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Not sure of the value of splitting of what is really only one paragraph. It may be better to make this an article about the camera stuff and turn the asteroid defense comment into an aside at the beginning. MilborneOne (talk) 10:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can expand the asteroid defense section, but I won't until this is decided, as it would keep edit histories clearer if it were split first. There is quite a bit of material on the asteroid defense scheme out there. As it is, the interstellar spaceship is more notable than the camera project. 76.66.197.151 (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the 1967 project be merged into 1566 Icarus, and that the 2009 project be kept as a separate article. Reyk _YO! 22:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SCOPE says that there should only be one topic here, not two. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 01:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Project Icarus → Project Icarus (photography) — the photography project is not the primary topic of "Project Icarus", and the usage is split between asteroid deflection and interstellar travel. So this article, should be moved, and this should redirect to the disambiguation page Icarus (disambiguation). As most of this article is about photography, the asteroid deflection scheme needs to be removed. (along with interstellar travel, also remove it) 70.24.248.23 (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The last two sections taken together amount to merging "Project Icarus (photography)#1967" (there was no photography related to 1967) into the existing section of 1566 Icarus, which I am doing. Frieda Beamy (talk) 22:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]