Jump to content

Talk:Princess Isabelle of Orléans (1900–1983)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 6 September 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 16:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Princess Isabelle of Orléans (1900–1983)Princess Isabelle of Orléans, Countess of Harcourt – To provide a more natural disambiguation, an improvement over using years of birth and death. Her husband already has Count of Harcourt in the article's name on his page. Killuminator (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. As Keivan.f said, Princess Isabelle of Orléans (1878–1961) should be moved to Princess Isabelle of Orléans, Duchess of Guise. estar8806 (talk) 01:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I can find reliable sources calling her Countess Bruno d'Harcourt, but none saying she was the Countess of Harcourt. This isn't a substantive peerage and shouldn't be forced into that style simply for wikipedia's sake. DrKay (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION says "Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title, is sometimes preferred. However, do not use obscure or made-up names." So, natural disambiguation does not apply in this case as there are no English reliable sources calling her this. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.