Talk:Prime zeta function

Just wondering where the last formula comes from (after "If we define a sequence"), what Lemma 2.7 is meant to be (which makes it appear this was all copied from somewhere) and if it is correct where it converges and if it converges any quicker than the u(n) series! PS Is there any interest in the zeros of this function, a few years back I calculated many hundreds of them which the Mathworld site used in their graphs without attribution. Andrew W 202.7.182.10 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lemma 2.7 is the lemma number 2.7 in the article by Li in the references. This has been mentioned because these facts have been threatened to be removed by wikipedian deletionists. R. J. Mathar (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a typo indicated by imbalanced parentheses in the Properties section. "with an infinite number of logarithmic singularities at points s where ns is a pole (only ns = 1))" Unfortunately I have no idea what any of this means so I don't know how to fix it. 99.45.117.132 (talk) 09:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why the P(s) table has values for n=2,3,4,5, and then 9?

In particular, skipping over n=6,7,8. 2600:1700:38D0:2870:7426:834D:1CE7:9E8D (talk) 02:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Property not clear

"where ns is a pole (only ns = 1 when n is a squarefree number greater than or equal to 1) ..." Riemann zeta function only has a pole at 1, so there are no other possibilities then ns = 1, regardless of n being squarefree or not. 2A04:CEC0:F07D:B8AB:440E:4E1:90:AE74 (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]