Talk:Potentially all pairwise rankings of all possible alternatives
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]page restored per DRV August 26th, 2010.
Thanks for your feedback ... But I can assure you that this method, which I co-invented, is, although relatively new, a bona fide approach to multi-criteria decision analysis. As such it belongs in a list of such methods at the article "multi-criteria decision analysis", and it needs to be explained (presumably in a linked article). The reference in the article is to an important peer-reviewed journal in the area (in the field of Operations Research). If you are in doubt, have a look at the article. If you cannot easily obtain a full copy, I am happy to email you a PDf. Paulwizard (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- (Added COI tag) Why would you want to discuss how patented technology works? And please avoid using the link to your web site, it's clearly promotional. --Abc518 (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Excessive links and detail
[edit]@Paulwizard added excessive details in July 2017 [1]
I understand the need to remove the concern for COI, since Paulwizard is a co-inventor of the page topic. Adding so many citations is overkill. I think going through some/all of them to check usefulness and/or relevance might be in order. Checking to see which are the most influential or notable references and discarding the rest is almost certainly necessary. Must INFORM (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)