This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
As you can see from the above merge banners and attributions, as well as here, there was consensus to merge position space and momentum space into one article as it's so much easier to explain the concepts together. What is your actual reason for splitting? M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk10:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
After having read the consensus that you linked i remove the split template from the article. Nevertheless one should think about treating Position and momentum space in own articles. One can talk about position space without talking about momentum space since position space is the natural space everyone knows. So only in momentum space one has to refer to the position space - but this reference can be quite short.--Biggerj1 (talk) 10:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]