Talk:Portrait of Napoleon III (Flandrin)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 25 November 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Portrait of Napoleon III to Portrait of Napoleon III (Flandrin). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 25 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Napoleon III → Portrait of Napoleon III (Flandrin) – Disambiguate, Portrait of Napoleon III (Winterhalter) already exists and is more famous. Gryffindor (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No primary topic. Srnec (talk) 23:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support – the Flandrin portrait only has three times as many pageviews, and even that is partially from base title advantage. WikiNav shows that the Winterhalter portrait gets at least 15% of the outgoing clicks, so in terms of "intentional pageviews" the ratio is at most 2:1. That's nowhere close to a primary topic by views in my opinion. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.