Talk:Polar climate

Arctic Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Weather: Climate Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Climate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Given that troposphere depth ranges from 20 km at equator to 7 km at poles, I would question that the distance the rays travel through air plays a role. For most areas, the depth of airmass and the angle would seem to cancel each other out, or even reverse the claim. Any meteorologists wish to comment, or provide references? Skaranko (talk) 13:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tundra versus ice cap

This use of the term "polar climate" seems to entirely skip over an important distinction. That is, the difference between having a reliably thawed summer and having a frozen summer. There is a huge difference between northern Scandinavia, which is full of life, and the lifeless plateaus of central Antarctica. In my view, there should be a page called "Tundra climate" separate from this one, which would only focus on year-round frozen places. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a good idea, if we expand the article with more detials. Some things to consider:

In the Koppen climate classification scheme, polar climate is a superset of both tundra climate and ice cap climate. If we follow WP:SUMMARYSTYLE, we should keep this article, and have sections about tundra article and ice cap cliamte, which use {{main}} to pint to separate articles. I'm not sure, however, that we have enough material to support a separate article on ice cap climate.
We already have an article on a climate very similar to tundra climate: alpine climate. I suspect we don't need a separate article on tundra climate (which would be largely duplicative), perhaps we should simply expand the alpine climate article with information about high-latitude tundra?

I have a suggestion. How about if you start an article on ice cap climate? Once that article become longer than a sub-stub, we can reorganize parts of this article to become a summary of all relevant articles. —hike395 (talk) 16:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The difference betweeen northern Scandinavia and Antarctica is also due to the fact that lowland areas of northern Scandinavia is not tundra, but subarctic or even oceanic (subpolar); see Rovaniemi, Luleå, Harstad. Lowland tundra only exist in a very small, narrow area in the extreme northeast near Vardø. The mountains, above treeline, is alpine tundra. Your main point about the difference tundra - ice cap is relevant. Orcaborealis (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to address Dondegroovily's concerns by adding a paragraph that explicitly describes the difference between ET and EF climates. Hope this helps. —hike395 (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation for fixing sentence

Currently the lead says

Regions with polar climate cover over 20% of the Earth. The sun shines 24 hours in the summer, and barely ever shines at all in the winter (see midnight sun and polar night).

The second sentence is absurd. It confuses the regions with a polar climate with the area right at the North (or South) Pole. In the polar region away from the pole itself, the midnight sun does not last all summer, and polar night does not last all winter. Moreover, areas with a polar climate that are outside the polar region (e.g. much of Greenland), never experience midnight sun or 24-hour night.

I'll change it accordingly.208.50.124.65 (talk) 17:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Polar climate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929131915/http://www.personal.dundee.ac.uk/~amjones/dundee/36biomes.htm to http://www.personal.dundee.ac.uk/~amjones/dundee/36biomes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English

Polar environment 102.46.231.116 (talk) 12:06, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]