Talk:Pokémon fan games/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 20:28, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 18:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Legal issues

1. I suggest changing from "parent company," as looking it up, that's not a term I see used to describe the relationship between the two companies elsewhere.

Let me know if the current wording is alright or should be changed. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

1. Regarding Tutty's comments, is he stating this as something he knows to be true, or is it just his opinion on why it is done?
2. Is Morrison a Nintendo/TPC lawyer, or an uninvolved lawyer?

On both Morrison and Tutty: Both seem to be uninvolved but both seem to be legal experts who would be qualified to comment on this, hence why they were consulted by WIRED and PC Gamer, so I don't see an issue with using them. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

1. I feel like "do not go after many games directly" and "Legal action is frequently threatened against both modifications of pre-existing Pokémon games and fangames" may contradict each other

Tried shifting some stuff around to clarify a bit. Both give conflicting accounts so I tried to reflect that a bit better. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin: addressed the above comments. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Spotcheck

1. [1] - Gets the date wrong for Crystal Clear (typo I assume)

@Cukie Gherkin: Fixed. Good catch on the typo. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

1. [2] Looks good
2. [3] Looks good
3. [4] Looks good

Passing - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:46, 3 November 2024 (UTC)