Talk:Plok!
Plok! was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 19, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
What? Citation?
[edit]Ali Jameel beat Plok on March 29 2006. A video will be available on request. This day will forever be known as St.ScottWilsonSmells's Day. What does this mean? It seems like it doesn't belong...
Unencyclopaedic Passage
[edit]Plok's token power-boosting pick-up are shells, and they look so lovely and chubby that you get a strange, compulsive urge to nab as many of them as you can. They also award extra lives and serve as ammo for a special amulet, so they're functional as well as pretty. Never has a small pick-up added so much to a game's experience
Does anyone else think that the wording of this passage is a little, well, unencylopaedic?Stovetopcookies 09:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- That's a quote from the manual RedNifre (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
About Plok
[edit]What is all the nonsense about there being many Plok-like people who have "moved away and/or evacuated"? How does the author justify calling this assumption "safe"? This is 100% speculation (which is absurd anyway, given that this is a fictional video game), and furthermore it doesn't even border on relevancy. Let's take it out. Chalkieperfect 21:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Plokbox.jpg
[edit]Image:Plokbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SNES Plok ScreenShot 2.png
[edit]Image:SNES Plok ScreenShot 2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:SNES Plok ScreenShot 3.png
[edit]Image:SNES Plok ScreenShot 3.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Release dates
[edit]The first part of the blurb says that the game was released in the US first in 1993, and later in Japan and Europe. The infobox says differently. Which is right? Tim (Xevious) (talk) 07:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Start-class?
[edit]Hi, so despite being Start-class, this article (in my opinion) is beyond Start-class, so maybe it should be a C/B-class? I dunno, at least we should do a peer review after it still doesn't meet the B/C-class criteria. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- We ended it. We decided to give it a B-class, as per Rater. If there's any inaccuracies, please talk to me. LucianoTheWindowsFan (talk) 19:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Plok!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 04:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
I volunteer to review this article.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 04:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm just a drive-by user. I noticed that Nutellafrenchtoast hasn't contributed signifcantly to the article, or has informed other editors of a GAN nomination on its talk page. Pinging the user just in case. I'll also ping HumanxAnthro, since they are also a significant contributor and might seem interested in this nomination. Sparkltalk 12:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I did not plan on this getting nominated, and he did not inform me. I'm requesting this close because I remember not completing the legacy section, which included how the comics were going and more from retrospective interviews with the Pickfords from NLife. Please close this. Thank you for the ping User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I see, and no problem. Seems like a fail or withdrawl would be the best case scenario here if Nutellafrenchtoast won't respond soon. Sparkltalk 22:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I did not plan on this getting nominated, and he did not inform me. I'm requesting this close because I remember not completing the legacy section, which included how the comics were going and more from retrospective interviews with the Pickfords from NLife. Please close this. Thank you for the ping User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Blue Pumpkin, I am not the one that nominated this, plus if I did, there would be some clean-up in terms of cite formatting and prose. User:HumanxAnthro (Nina CortexxCoco Bandicoot) 17:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- {{ping|HumanxAnthro} no problem. i'll close as fail for now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 22:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)