Talk:Pipistrellus raceyi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice article :) Just a couple things:

Thanks for the review! Ucucha 06:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

• Mention common name(s) in the lead, if
  • Done. I sometimes don't mention common names in the lead if they are very obscure (like those for Oryzomys albiventer, which were last mentioned in print in 1918), but in this case it seems good enough.

• What does he eat?
  • Insects, I guess, but none of the sources report on it.

• No kodak moments? ;) Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:48, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
  • No freely licensed ones, at least. Bates et al. have a picture of one licking its uropatagium. Ucucha 06:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
    • Okee-dokey :) But what's say we external link to a site with some P. raceyi eye candy? Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
      • The only thing that could we worth linking to is the original description, which is already linked as a reference. Ucucha 05:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
        • I guess I shouldn't think that only the strictly scientific literature can have useful information—thanks for adding that article; I used it as a reference. Ucucha 16:22, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

We pass! Really well done article to start with! Good working with you again :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:12, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Pipistrellus raceyi passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass