Talk:Phyllis' Wedding

Phyllis' Wedding has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Phyllis' Wedding is part of the The Office (American season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 25, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
January 5, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dunder Mifflin

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this scene deleted?

Phyllis seats Angela next to Dennis, a religious man. The two get along well, but when Dennis asks Angela for her telephone number, Angela tells him she's already having intimate relations with someone. Dennis apologizes, saying "Phyllis neglected to mention your promiscuity."

This isn't a deleted scene, is it? Or is it only in the DVD version that it appears within the regular body of the show? 192.197.178.2 (talk) 13:53, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possessive punctuation

The correct punctuation for a singular possessive (i.e. referring to one person named Phyllis) is Phyllis's.
Phyllis' is a plural possessive, indicating more than one person named Phyllis.

Unfortunately, the producers of the DVD containing this episode have gotten the spelling wrong on the DVD and its packaging, but NBC has also been known to spell Phyllis's correctly on its website.

Reverting and/or altering good faith edits without discussion, and especially without admitting what you're doing in your edit summary (as in these edits [1] and [2], by User 72.250.218.148) is extremely impolite and borders on vandalism.--TyrS (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what edit are you linking to by me? Because I never made that edit. I just reverted vandalism as you can see here. 20:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Drovethrughosts (talk)

Many apologies, Drovethrughosts. In the attempt to track down where the spelling change had been made I got mixed up and it looked like it was your edit. I've altered my post above. Again, I'm really sorry about that.--TyrS (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mix-ups happen. No problem. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your link is rubbish. It says either is used, but s' rather than s's is the most used version. You labelling these edits "vandalism" is farcical and frankly wrong. Did you not learn at school that "s's" is wrong? No-one I've ever seen uses this, just you. Paralympiakos (talk) 13:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like you should wait a few years until you try to participate in a grown-up forum, Paralympiakos.--TyrS (talk) 03:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Episode-Number

There is a mistake in the numbering of episodes:

IMDB counts one less than Wikipedia does. Due to a double-episode

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/The_Office_(U.S._season_3)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386676/episodes?season=3

somebody please figure out how this is solved. 84.72.254.113 (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phyllis's Wedding/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 15:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image: This really isn't needed and doesn't have a good rationale

Yeah, I removed it earlier and another editor re-added it. I've removed it again, as I agree it doesn't add much to article. Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intro: I would move the bit about the drums to the third paragraph and add a bit about guest stars to the first

Done Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis: "Dwight doesn't…" -> "Dwight does not…"

Done Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis: "his and Pam's song." Maybe add what that song is. I can't remember off the top of my head…

Done (It was You Were Meant for Me) Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Production: "his fifth such credit for the series" Is there a cite for this?

I added the four episodes he directed as citations. Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Production: "It features the first wedding from the series." I feel this is a tad clunky. Maybe "The episode is the first of the series to revolve around a wedding."

Done Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception: graded the episode with an A -> graded the episode with an "A" Add quotes

Done Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References: Ref. 5 and 11 have quote issues

Fixed Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: Make sure they're in alphabetical order. Just a little nit picky. ;)

Done Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I could find. Good article! On hold.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:10, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All should be fixed. Thanks for the review! Ruby 2010/2013 02:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good! I will pass! :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Phyllis' Wedding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]