Talk:Phoenix Point

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 June 2017 by reviewer AdrianGamer (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"There is No Plan B" gameindustry.biz. 2017-04-26. Retrieved 2017.06.14.
"Phoenix Point is now crowdfunding: we spoke to Julian Gollop about standing out in a post-XCOM world" rockpapershotgun.com. 2017-04-25. Retrieved 2017.06.14.
"Phoenix Point's Fig Campaign Promises New Take on Class X-COM Formula" polygon.com. 2017-04-25. Retrieved 2017.06.14.
"Interview: Julian Gollop on New Game Phoenix Point" pcpowerplay.com.au. 2016-06-27. Retrieved 2017.06.14
"RPG Codex Interview: Julian Gollop on Phoenix Point" rpgcodex.net. 2017-05-05. Retrieved 2017.06.27.

Complete https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Phoenix_Point#Mutating_aliens should be removed, as it is NOT YET implemented in game, its wished feature now.

https://forums.snapshotgames.com/t/pandoras-responsive-mutation-is-it-a-myth/11842

Rastavox (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reception section needs an edit

this is the first time I’ve ever commented on a wiki page so forgive me, but the reception section is a clunky mess. It’s written in present tense and contains a lot of repeated words and sentence structure. For example, “Still, he claims the game was so good he didn't care. Still, he notices weak combat AI and bugs.”

“he” isn't given a name either. The paraphrasing also comes off as vague selective.

2601:282:E00:4A70:E81B:5737:AEDD:C5E2 (talk) 06:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"but the reception section is a clunky mess".

It was worse when it only showed one view-point. You can't do style, the actual content (what thoughts are expressed), and everything meticulously for free. You have to do other things, too.

"It’s written in present tense".

When I wrote: "he claims the game was so good", well, I meant he didn't change his mind. He was claiming in the review and it's still his opinion. I agree that it becomes strange, as the review in question gets older and older.

Still, the reception section is not written in present tense: "He concluded", "IGN said that the game was", "Polygon wrote that", "GameSpot reviewer felt the game arouses", "He also wrote that"...

So, you are actually exaggeratting the section is a mess. MichalZim (talk) 07:46, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]