Jump to content

Talk:Philadelphia transit strike of 1944/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article for potential GA status. My review should be posted shortly. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 13:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am placing this article on hold for seven days to allow time for the below points to be addressed. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I'll start working on addressing your comments in the next few days. Nsk92 (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and formatting

[edit]

I have done some further copy-editing and am now mostly satisfied with this criterion. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy and verifiability

[edit]
  • "At the time of the elections many white workers perceived the contract issue to be more important, where the TWU was promising more attractive terms, and they did not consider promotions of black employees a realistic possibility. Despite the TWU victory, animosities from white workers towards the black employees remained and were largely unabated" - source?
  • "Germany, as well as Japan, were apt to use every instance of racial unrest in the U.S. for propaganda purposes." - source?
  • Don't repeat full source information in Notes for sources included in References
    • There were three such items. For the TIME article I reduced its description in the Notes to article name+journal name. The other two items were two different sources by James Wolfinger. Since they have the same author, I reduced their description in the Notes to author name+name of the source article/book+relevant page numbers. I hope this is OK. Nsk92 (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Convention here is usually to either list author+date, or to use author+a shortened version of the title.
  • References should be in alphabetical order
  • Use a consistent format for notes
  • Cite by author's last name instead of title for shortened citations
  • Note 23: title? Pages? Author (if signed)?

Broad

[edit]

No issues noted

Neutrality

[edit]

No issues noted

Stability

[edit]

No issues noted

Images

[edit]
  • Consider alternating which side images are on instead of stacking them vertically
  • Source link for first image is dead
    • Back in August, when I was working on the article, GoogleBooks provided a preview for the entire 1944 article from The Crisis where this image comes from. I see now that as of this moment only snippet view of the article is available in GoogleBooks[1]. I removed the dead link from the image page description. However, I hope the inclusion of the image is still OK even though an online version of the source article is not longer available; the publication details for the print version of the source article containing the image are provided, including the page number where the image occurs.
      • Yes, that's fine
  • Roosevelt image - source link is dead, and author information suggests the photo was taken by an AP photographer, which nullifies the licensing tag
  • I've just had someone email in this picture although the unit had since moved on to Europe. I don't know if that is helpful? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]