Talk:Phil Hine

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Occult Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Good Start

This article seems to have atleast a halfway good start. I have requested sources and a tone suitable to wikipedia and will try in the future to make the improvements myself. Thank you. AlexanderLevian 17:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability issues

I would suggest that adding publication info (publishers, years, location, ISBNs) to the listed publications would help assess notability. I would also caution some of the editors on this and related articles that their labeling of one another's edits as vandalism is inappropriate. Content disputes are not vandalism. --Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 22:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are when you get banned for them and return under a slightly different IP. Perhaps some would be more quick to assume good faith if others would actually register an account. --Tsuzuki26 22:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon

Article was recently AfDed and speedily kept. It's certainly not appropriate to speedily delete it. —Hanuman Das 06:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A word from the subject

Hello there

I'll admit to having mixed feelings about being the subject of a wikipedia entry. My first impulse, on encountering this entry, was to request it be deleted. I am generally "shy" about providing biographical information - and I have to say that I found myself agreeing with the contention that I am not particularly "notable" - at least I don't tend to think of myself in those terms. Interestingly enough, the things I have done, which I do take some small measure of pride in are not mentioned - presumably because they cannot be sourced via the internet.

I have no major contentions with the content of this page, apart from some minor corrections:

I do not consider myself an artist - all the work in the art section of my website is by my partner,
I am no longer a member of the Illuminates of Thanateros
I have never been a member of the "Ordo Draconis"

Philipmhine 11:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

minor edits

I just made some small edits:

re: editorship of Chaos International

Minor issue - I only edited issue 5 of Chaos International - there were four other editors before my involvement. I haven't contributed to the magazine since issue 23.

Contribution to journals

I have amended the line regarding my contribution to journals as my most active period was circa 1986-1996 and since then, it's been at best, sporadic.

Philipmhine 14:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sources/style

I have made the tone a bit more encyclopedic, it would also be great to see more sources provided for the quotes etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merkinsmum (talk • contribs) 08:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I've noticed that this page is tagged as "not citing it's references or sources," The sources are being gathered and displayed as they come. I am removing this tag and hoping that information needing citation can be given a "^{[citation needed]}", so that this unnecessary and ugly tag may be dropped. AlexanderLevian 17:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does have the ^{[citation needed]} things which i put in. That means it needs the tag really. It's not a slur on the article, it's so new editors viewing it or previous editors are reminded and encouraged to work on getting sources. But then again, there are a few in here I suppose.:)Merkinsmum 23:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removal

Removed tags out of date by now (notability), since by now, 2016, Phil Hine is notable as poss. Manytexts (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Phil Hine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928023617/http://occultebooks.com/articles/PhilHine/Romancingtheshadow/tabid/122/Default.aspx to http://occultebooks.com/articles/PhilHine/Romancingtheshadow/tabid/122/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio

The lead currently in use on this page dates from 6 April 2004, evolving organically in May 2004. It was expanded and the word "British" was added in 2011 by me. Then reduced to its current form by removing the 2nd phrase.

In contrast, the first book by Hine to be published by MIT won't come out until November 2022. MIT did not have an author bio until they committed to publishing the book earlier this year. The bio has not even been archived by Internet Archiver yet. If you want to prove a copyvio, you'll have to show that the page existed prior to the April 2004. Good luck. Skyerise (talk) 18:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are correct on review, thank you for helping clarify this. 99.33.184.99 (talk) 18:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]