Talk:Petticoating

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

It is requested that an image or photograph of Petticoating be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

See Talk:Petticoat Discipline for lots of discussion on this issue. Mdwh 02:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender cat

I've removed the transgender cat, since this article seems to have almost nothing to do with Transgender. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 19:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

While the "punishment" aspect seems to be documented well enough, almost none of the references dealing with the fetish/eroticism aspect are properly cited. For example, most do not fit the criteria for a reliable source (those involving the "Petticoat Discipline Quarterly" website). In another example - "Classics in the History of Psychology" - I don't see those claims made anywhere in that citation (please correct me if I'm wrong). The literary citations and the "The ambiguous politics of petticoating" citation at most note that the phenomena exists, but make no mention of the other various claims. The Peter Farrer stuff does not support the various claims either (at least from the information available from the citation links) and even if they did, it seems unlikely they would meet the criteria for a reliable source (please see Wikipedia:No_original_research, specifically the Sources section, and Wikipedia:Verifiability if you're wondering what I'm talking about).

Based on the existing references, the only parts of the article that are currently supported are (arguably): the first sentence of the 1st paragraph, the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph, the "Political incorrectness" section, and the "Literary accounts" section.

(As a side note, it seems the article blurs the punishment phenomenon and the sexual phenomenon; they maybe should be 2 separate articles.) So unless anyone says otherwise, I'll give it a change soon. Thanks for hearing me out. Xarmy of meX (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Pinafore eroticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pinafore eroticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110116230836/http://www.pfc.org.uk:80/node/179 to http://www.pfc.org.uk/node/179

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Feminization (activity)

We should now take the opportunity to merge this article into Feminization (activity), thus eliminating a redundant hyper-specialized article which covers a topic that can be dealt with in no more than a paragraph in that article. -- The Anome (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is six years late but I agree that this article should be merged.Computer-ergonomics (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a good article title

"Pinafore eroticism"? The phrase can't be found in a Google Books search and doesn't seem common at all. I thought it was usually called "petticoating". Equinox ◑ 23:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 April 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinafore eroticism → Petticoating – The usual name for this practice appears to be "petticoating" or "petticoat punishment". Search Google Books and you will find basically nothing for the phrase "pinafore eroticism", which seems to have been invented by Wikipedia. Equinox ◑ 12:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.