Talk:Peter Strzok
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Strzok article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 December 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Length of lead
[edit]WP:LEADLENGTH suggests that when an article has 15,000 to 30,000 characters then two or three paragraphs are okay for the lead. So I will cut back the lead to three paragraphs & remove the tag. Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please propose any chanages here on talk. Wholesale changes are likely to be reverted for discussion, and it's an unnecessary step. SPECIFICO talk 18:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t expect any response here at the talk page, so why should I bother making a proposal here? For example, restoration of the merge tag hasn’t been explained here even though someone removed it at the other article. Nor has any alternative way of shortening the lead been suggested here, so that tag can be removed, User:SPECIFICO. Nor has any explanation been given for reverting this edit which inserted a date into a footnote. When edits are reverted for no reason, with no explanation, it’s hard to see what point is served by making formal proposals at the talk page. Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- When none of the millions of Wikipedia editors respond to your recommendations, it's safe to assume they do not have consensus. SPECIFICO talk 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus". You need a substantive reason, you need to explain your reasoning. Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- When none of the millions of Wikipedia editors respond to your recommendations, it's safe to assume they do not have consensus. SPECIFICO talk 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t expect any response here at the talk page, so why should I bother making a proposal here? For example, restoration of the merge tag hasn’t been explained here even though someone removed it at the other article. Nor has any alternative way of shortening the lead been suggested here, so that tag can be removed, User:SPECIFICO. Nor has any explanation been given for reverting this edit which inserted a date into a footnote. When edits are reverted for no reason, with no explanation, it’s hard to see what point is served by making formal proposals at the talk page. Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Since the lead is three paragraphs, I've removed the "lead too long" tag. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:23, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Strzok
[edit]This aged well, no mention of Durham investigation that outed both him and his GF. Come on man 2600:8807:328B:E900:7DD3:61BF:3335:8C56 (talk) 18:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- "Outed" him as what? If you want to propose a change, be specific and back them up with reliable sources. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Page
[edit]Does the current version of this article state whether Strzok is still in a relationship with Lisa Page? If so, I wasn't able to find this information (which anyone visiting this article might expect to find here). 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Misleading and dishonest content
[edit]Strzok was not fired because he disparaged Trump and his supporters in private emails. He was fired because he discussed using the Russian collusion hoax as an "insurance policy" to get rid of Trump if he won the election.
Page wrote Trump is “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Strzok replied, “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”
FloridaArmy (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Source? – Muboshgu (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Affair?
[edit]No mention of the affair he had with a woman on his 107.215.24.183 (talk) 17:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Peter Strzok#Text messages, first sentence:
The IG's investigation examined thousands of text messages exchanged using FBI-issued cell phones between Strzok and Lisa Page, with whom he was having an extramarital affair.
All you had to do was CTRL+F "affair" – Muboshgu (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
No longer cohosts podcast
[edit]Late November, 2024 he "had to leave" his podcast host role with MSW Media. Though I can't find any reporting on the reasons, both he and Allison Gill they indicated that it wasn't their choice during their final broadcast together. 2601:19C:5182:6210:4088:1C90:2144:E0F7 (talk) 21:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
- Question: Do you have citations for Strzok leaving the podcast? Peaceray (talk) 17:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- Biography articles needing attention
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class District of Columbia articles
- Low-importance District of Columbia articles
- WikiProject District of Columbia articles
- District of Columbia articles needing attention
- C-Class FBI articles
- High-importance FBI articles
- WikiProject FBI articles
- FBI articles needing attention
- C-Class United States Presidents articles
- Mid-importance United States Presidents articles
- WikiProject United States Presidents articles
- United States Presidents articles needing attention
- C-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- United States Government articles needing attention
- United States articles needing attention
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Mid-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Law enforcement articles
- Mid-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- C-Class Espionage articles
- Low-importance Espionage articles
- C-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs