Talk:Peruvian Amazon Company/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Tavantius (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Arawoke (talk · contribs) 14:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Tavantius (talk · contribs) 04:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

It is really close to fulfilling the criteria, however, in some parts o the article, it seems to not be very focused on the plantation itself. Also, the last section seems to be a tad bit too short. If you could add to it, that would be nice. Tavantius (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this feedback! I will be able to address those two points on Wednesday-Thursday. Arawoke (talk) 06:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have added two new sections to this article, would you mind giving feedback on how well I addressed your comment? I have more information that I can add, or I can make clarifications where necessary. Arawoke (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, I didn't get pinged. Nevermind that, it seems good enough to be accepted. Tavantius (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.